Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- windows:command_prompt [2023-08-26 22:49] – created dave
+++ windows:command_prompt [2024-12-13 18:20] (current) – [cmd.exe] dave
@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 </code>
-//Yes, I should probably learn Powershell but I have enough shit to learn and powershell uses insanely long hyphenated commands.  I know you can tab complete but still, WTF?   Also, after being Windows-free and generally Microsoft free for five years and coming back, I've realized that Microsoft makes shit. The issue is largely the UI.  I **like** having a lot of options but the MS UIs are sooo freaking busy that I can never find anything.//
+//Yes, I should probably learn Powershell but I have enough shit to learn and powershell uses insanely long hyphenated commands.  I know you can tab complete but still, WTF?   Also, after being Windows-free and generally Microsoft free for five years and coming back, I've realized that Microsoft makes shit software. The issue is largely the UI.  I **like** having a lot of options but the MS UIs are sooo freaking busy that I can never find anything.//
@@ Line 55: / Line 55: @@
 ==== For Loop Ping Sweep ====
 From: https://www.rubyguides.com/2012/02/cli-ninja-ping-sweep/
+<code>
  for /L %i in (1,1,255) do @ping -n 1 -w 200 192.168.1.%i > nul && echo 192.168.1.%i is up.
+</code>
 As you can see the idea is the same, -n being the equivalent of -c in Linux’s ping and -w is the timeout, then we send the output to nul and echo only if the ping command was successful (that’s what the && is for)
@@ Line 72: / Line 74: @@
   setx PATH "path with quotes if there are spaces (there are)"
+===== Line count (like wc -l) =====
+[[https://superuser.com/questions/959036/what-is-the-windows-equivalent-of-wc-l|What is the Windows equivalent of "wc -l"?]]
+<code>
+find /c /v ""
+</code>